What is the Difference Between Advocates Lawyers and Judges?

The difference between advocates and judges is the amount of experience a lawyer has. In South Africa, advocates are appointed by the President on the basis of merit, skill, and experience. While advocates are not necessarily judges, they are often appointed by the President if they have a demonstrated ability to win a case. In some cases, judges may appoint advocates. In general, lawyers with at least ten years of experience are appointed by the President.

Lawyers advise clients on all matters of law and may also argue a case in court. Judges preside over courts of law and must be impartial, rendering a fair decision based on a thorough knowledge of the law. Judges may also share duties with juries, but the latter are more often the decision maker. If you have any questions about the differences between advocates lawyers and judges, feel free to ask us.

To practice law before the Supreme Court, an advocate must pass the Supreme Court’s Advocate on Record Examination. Advocates are referred to as “advocates” in Scotland and Northern Ireland. An advocate must possess a law degree (a Bachelor of Laws or LL.B.) and have completed a legal practice course, equivalent to being called to the bar. Alternatively, an advocate may be a solicitor or barrister.

What is the difference between advocates lawyers and judges and their roles in the courts? As lawyers, advocates are granted right of audience in the courts of the Isle of Man. Their role involves advising and representing clients on legal matters pertaining to the law. They may advise clients on civil or criminal cases, regulatory matters, property transactions, and business law. An advocate is formally known as an “advocate” and wears a gown and stiff collar.

Leave a Reply

Back to top button